Find an event

Access denied: Daily Herald to begin charging online toll

Posted in Robert Feder | Chicago Media blog by Robert Feder on Aug 31, 2011 at 12:00am

Chuck Goudie

Although he’s best known as the straight-shooting chief investigative reporter for ABC 7, Chuck Goudie often does his most insightful and provocative work as a free-lance columnist for the suburban Daily Herald. In print and online for more than 10 years, he’s been serving up sharp commentary on everything from politics and religion to media and pop culture.

But after next week, Goudie’s fans will have to pay for the privilege of reading his column — along with everything else on the Daily Herald’s web site. As of September 7, the newspaper will become the first in the Chicago area to charge for its online product. Web-only access will cost $19.99 a month. Print subscribers will be charged $1 a week for digital access.

In the wake of Tuesday’s announcement, Goudie was still sorting out what it will mean for his readers — and for his future as a columnist.

“Over the years I have heard from people around the world who have read my Monday column on the Internet and wanted to respond,” he told me. “There have also been countless investigative leads that web site readers have sent to me after accessing certain columns. The links to some columns have also been widely circulated via Facebook and Twitter. That kind of reach, from a suburban-based Chicago newspaper, has been a driving force in writing the column for more than 10 years.”

Despite Goudie’s misgivings and those of a few Daily Herald staffers I contacted, initial reaction to the paywall plan has been “overwhelmingly positive,” according to publisher Doug Ray, chairman and CEO of parent company Paddock Publications.

“As you can imagine, there were many questions from reporters and editors at meetings held yesterday in Arlington Heights and in our offices around the suburbs,” Ray told me. “But our journalists understand that their work has value and that the days of free content are over. And I believe they understand why it is necessary.”

Ray shared a note he received from one longtime editor, who wrote: “May I say how excited I am about the company’s paid content plan. It is also a little terrifying, but I’m absolutely thrilled that we’re setting the trend and perhaps inviting (daring?) the rest of the industry to follow us, instead of waiting for someone else to make a move. I honestly feel invigorated and will do my best to ensure the staff is the same when the announcement is made.  I’ll bet they won’t need a lot of prodding.”

In a letter to readers, Ray said the payment structure “will enable us to continue to provide the kind of quality local news and the journalism expected from the Daily Herald,” adding: “Newspapers all over the country are realizing that they cannot rely solely on the income from advertisers to create and sustain the kind of journalism the community deserves, as new media have taken an increasingly larger slice of the available marketing dollars.”

Print subscribers who don’t wish to pay the extra dollar a week for online access can simply opt out, Ray said. Online readers, he acknowledged, already are complaining loudly about the change.

“Those who had been receiving free access don’t like the fact that they will now be required to pay and are railing about it. We have made no attempt to minimize their comments, nor would we. Of course, they have been getting free of charge much of what our subscribers have been paying for — the journalism — and they won’t any longer.”

The biggest unknown may be how advertisers respond. That’s something “we will not know until the dust settles,” Ray said, “but we believe the paid content model will command higher rates. We have developed two new advertising positions on our home page to accommodate additional advertising interest and to ensure we have inventory to meet customers’ needs.”

First Steve Dahl starts charging listeners for a podcast they once got for free. Now the Daily Herald is billing readers for access to content on its web site. Any guesses what’s next?

Previous post
Next post
08/31/2011
Share with your network
Comment
Comments
It'll be a failure. The New York Times produces unique articles of good quality. Stuff that you may not find elsewhere. They can get away with charging for their content. The Daily Herald rarely produces unique articles. You can always find the same stories at one of the local Sun-Times papers, Trib local, and other local newspapers' websites. Sometimes these other papers do a better job of reporting. The Daily Herald online is worth $1 a week, but that price is only offered if you are already a print subscriber. Their online content is definitely not worth $20/month, not when you can get it from other sources.
By Martin (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 12:12 am
I second that comment.
By Doug (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 12:15 am
This eloquent commentary can be yours for only $1 per word after September 7. Let's see, I can subscribe to the paper for $60/year - or - pay $240/year under this new online plan...let me think about it. http://www.discountednewspapers.com/Daily-Herald/index.html?source=suboff&affiliate=18226584
By Paid Commentator Mark Kessler (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 12:16 am
The Daily Herald is not the New York Times or the Wall St. Journal. Who is going to dish out that kind of money?
By Radiohead (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 12:20 am
My guess what's next: Feder's column going behind a paywall? All of Time Out Chicago going behind a paywall? (Please, Joe Mansueto, no. For the love of God....)
By Lorenzo Felix (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 12:34 am
Honestly, I am not sure why I haven't had to pay for this sooner. How do you think these new sources make money for their content? You pay for print editions... why wouldn't you pay online? Yes, there are other resources online, but most of them pull their info from the hardworking dedicated reporters that are out on the street getting the story. It can't be free forever ladies and gents.
By Jonathan (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 12:45 am
Pay for a web-paper -- why, when there is usually a free copy of a newspaper nearby. For years newspapers and advertisers have known they have many readers who did not pay for the paper. After an initial paid "read," used papers can be found on buses/trains, in restaurants, in motel lobbies, circulated around offices, etc. Advertisers appreciate this additional exposure. I used to read Feder's Sun-Times column, for free, regularly for many years, but probably purchased fewer than a dozen papers during the same time period. I appreciate advertiser-supported newspapers and broadcasters. I do not anticipate starting a subscription for print or electronic editions of any newspaper. The Daily Herald's advertisers will no longer be able to count me as a viewer of its web-paper.
By Jon (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 1:35 am
Of course I never believed that Dahl had the 20,000 daily downloads he was claiming when his podcast was free, but now he's not saying how many people have forked over the 10 bucks a month to download his show, so I'm guessing he has 300 listeners? You can't give something away for free for years and then expect people to pay for it, especially when it's not all that good to begin with.
By Good Luck With That (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 1:38 am
The first comment by Martin; he said it well... I'd add as a Daily Herald subscriber I'm satisfied with their quality. But as a news consumer, I don't need access to Daily Herald stories about Naperville as a resident of Palatine. It might be worth $1 a month to filter out all the excess information, but not $20 a month.
By Mr Nauseated (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 3:38 am
Pay for the DH? NO, Pay for Steve Dahl, NO WAY IN HELL, Dahl was bad when he was on free Radio, why pay for that? I pay for HBO- that is worth it. It's all about choices.
By Sista Sledge (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 5:52 am
The Daily Herald is not a great paper to begin with. Clearly, it isn't the New York Times. Not by the longest stretch of the imagination. I canceled my print subscription years ago after I got sick of typo after typo, poor formatting in which stories got chopped off and didn't continue elsewhere in the paper, and pathetic coverage. Watch their online-and print readership tumble into oblivion.
By Rob (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 6:07 am
I can't believe Robert Feder would screw up such a headline. The headline should be "Daily Herald decides to close online version of paper". The monthly charge is just a means to that end. When the MBA braintrust that came up with this brilliant idea figures out that this wasn't a good idea, the damage will be done. I might pay $20 per year, but forget it at $20/month. Clearly they think this will make people get the rag subscription and add the online at a low rate. I get the rag thrown at my door daily now, and I won't pay $52 per year for online. Screw that! I'll plan on getting my haircut more often and read a week at a time at the barber shop.
By bozo, a clown. (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 6:43 am
If the Daily Hearld was to use the proposed fee to hire some new and exciting journalists, I think it might be worth it. If the funds are only used to pay stringers to read the Trib and summarize suburban issues for areas I don't care about, I doubt it will work. And it may even backfire and cause the DH to lose current subscribers and online readers and reduce advertising revenue.
By Krishnan (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 6:44 am
No matter what the delivery system, when people start refusing to pay for good reporters, columnists,editors, etc. where will the news come from? Elevator screens? Internet home pages? TV? (Where you have no choice to look at an ad or not) Nothing good can be free. People need to be paid. BUT, $20.00 a month right out of the chute when there are still many other less expensive sources available? Ouch.
By Doug VORified (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 6:44 am
Remember when banks started charging fess for using ATMs, and the public went "nuts"? Subscription Radio? Cable TV? The winds are changing, once again. The WWW took off and it took off fast, all things considered. SOMEONE has figured out the internet cannot remain "free" much longer and once you determine that you need to make money at what you're doing,...you need to make money at what you're doing. I use to casually listen to Howard Stern when radio was relatively enjoyable. Did I like him enough to sign up for satellite radio? No. I use to watch all the original programming from HBO when I could easily afford it. Today, I can only afford "basic" cable. The long+short? If you like Chuck or the Daily Herald...it's time to pony up. Eventually, the internet will be a "Pay 2 Stay" when content is valuable. Websites won't be able to live on the pennies they receive from advertisers when you click on a site. And, even after the dust clears and sites and podcasters look at their final numbers...advertising dollars will become more specific. Anyone ever see see the movie Minority Report?
By jonesyjr (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 6:51 am
Basically what Mr. Feder has given us here is a Daily Herald corporate press release. But Time Out Chicago did not make us pay to read it. Outside of opinion pieces, all of which have zero value to me, the rest of the Daily Herald (and nearly every other newspaper) is nothing but reformatted press releases - and mostly from government entities. People stopped buying the newspaper NOT because the content was on-line, but because it has such little value there is no point in paying $1 day for it. Journalism is worth paying for, but most newspapers provide absolutely none. Even the newspapers that DO actual journalism provide so little of it on a weekly basis - the Trib and NYT maybe have 10 actual journalistic pieces a week - that subscribing is a waste of money.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 7:25 am
20.00 a month really, really... Epic fail! Sorry, it's just not worth it Paddock Publications. There are other sources. $20 dollars really?
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 8:00 am
Quality of the paper aside, I, generally speaking, don't have a problem with a newspaper charging for online content in a manner similar to the way they charge for print content. But, I have a big problem with them charging print subscribers for online content. If someone subscribes to the print edition, they should get the online content for free.
By Heather Benton (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 8:01 am
I heard Bruce W00lf offet to give Phil Ponce interviewing lessons. Could any really thing Bruce W00lf has more talent then Ponce, except Bruce W00lf?
By Verified (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 8:17 am
"Print subscribers will be charged $1 a week for digital access." This move is so incredibly stupid, I'm very tempted to cancel my print subscription out of spite. Asinine. -- MrJM
By MrJM (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 8:22 am
That "long-time editor" who wrote the note saying how jazzed he was about this move sounds like someone who would be good covering politics at Pravda.
By DeJordy (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 8:44 am
A desperate move that's not going to work. In this economy people will get their news elsewhere. Who came up with the idea and pricing? Did they do any research? I do feel bad for DH employees but they need to focus on getting more eyeballs to their website so that they can charge more to online advertisers...this move will send eyeballs to other sources. They won't generate revenue through subscriptions and they won't be able to charge more for online ads since impressions and page views will go down. Sorry but fail.
By John (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 9:09 am
Epic fail. You have to have quality news and engaging content in order to justify charging for it. I'll stick to the Trib and Sun-Times website for news and forget paying for wire pick-up online. However, thanks for the quality media news entertainment, DH. It should be an interesting ride.
By BCWC (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 9:10 am
What's next you ask? Let's check back on this three months from now. Besides, if the Daily Herald (strictly a 'burb newspaper) charged $9.95 per month, they might have something. But at $19.95 per month, which averages out to almost $240.00 per year, they have got to be kidding. At that rate, the Tribune should charge $39.95 per month since they serve the entire State. And if Zell thinks he can get away with that outlandish charge, go for it! But I hope he never expects to exit bankruptcy.
By P.G. Crawford (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 9:39 am
At a time when the newspaper industry struggling, I'm not sure how charging extra for the ability to read the same content on line will help boost revenue when the "paper" version is wanning. In the current economy people will choose one or the other, not one and the other. What's wrong with the Herald is the quality of the content product it publishes: it's weak. Outside of a few exceptional columns like yours, the Wednesday Food section,stories/editorialstaken from the national wires, the remainder of the paper is rife with ads often covering half or more of most pages...the local pieces are then too often small blurbs and "local" or special interest pieces limited to the front and inside back page. I understand ads pay the bills, but it's not balanced with enough purposeful news. Readers who find navigating a website cumbersome and time consuming as the Herald's and others already are, feel it akin to the layers of prompts when calling a 1-800 help me number...for this, press that. Improving quality of the product might well encourage more readers who would probably pay more, and still make money for the corporation. As one who has been tetering on the brink of canceling my subscription already, charging me for the occasional time I might go to the web to recover an article....this helps me make my decision...I imagine it will for other readers too.
By Sarah (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 9:40 am
$20 to read the daily herald online?!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
By Timm Dogg (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 9:51 am
How many thousands of people have dropped cable TV and gone to a la carte services like Netflix? I see something like that as the next business model for the news media. Bundle a bunch of newspapers and TV News channels in a flat 'low monthly fee'.
By Chi Chi (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 9:57 am
I quit getting the print version of the Herald and the Trib when I couldn't get the version for my area. Living in Geneva, I'd like to get the edition that covers the Tri Cities area. Not Naperville and Downers Grove. I was told by both papers that wasn't possible. I haven't gotten a paper in years. The free sites at AP, or BBC America are all the news I need.
By MIke in Geneva (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 10:05 am
I like Bruce Wolf; I think he has a great personality, funny and honest (he has an opinion too). So all you jealous people out there, boo you.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 10:05 am
$20 a month is ridiculous. Have fun with that.
By Finn (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 10:13 am
Doug Ray declares the idea a success based on favorable comments only from his staff? Yet he acknowledges that most of the paper's readers are complaining? How in the world does that constitute a success? The readers are the customers and the only ones who matter! This guy clearly has his head shoved up his own ass. If your customers are complaining about your service then your business is dead. Simple as that. How is it that these completely incompetent idiots who don't even understand basic business principles of serving the customer with what they want is the only thing that's important? This paid subscription is a joke and the really sad thing is that Ray will likely never have to answer for his stupidity.
By He Who Must Not Be Named (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 10:28 am
When the Daily Herald writers and editors learn to push the simple "Spell Check" key before publishing an article, maybe they'd earn a little journalistic respect from their readers. I'll pay for best-in-class product, but the Daily Herald is far from it.
By Not Gonna Happen (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 10:32 am
20 bucks a month?? It will be a monumental failure as long as there are other places to get news, Trib,Times,Southtown, etc.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 10:42 am
Anonymous - Like I said Bruce, you are the only one.
By verified (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 11:44 am
Bottom line. Journalists are tied to integrity and can be quoted in academic writings and discussions. Although nothing is black and white and journalists have never been completely objective, we hold them to a higher standard than a blogger. 20 years from now, if I asked a student for a report about Chicago Politics in 2011, they better be referencing published books and newspapers. Not blogs. There is WORTH to journalism. There is community SUBSTANCE. I pay to read a book, I will pay to read a newspaper online as well. I do believe the rates are high, but I also believe that the Daily Herald will learn and adjust.
By Jen (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 11:50 am
I was in the suburbs once and I saw this newspaper. I was shocked that people paid for a printed version. I cannot imagine that anyone would want to pay $20 a month to read about school budget meetings in Rolling Meadows.
By Joe (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 11:53 am
Wow! I love reading user comments. I really don't understand the negativity. The DH is a business and they are entitled to charge for their product just as you're entitled to not buy it. Comments like 'how can you charge for something the was free?' crack me up. It's simple: if you want to keep getting the same product, or hopefully one better, it will now cost something. The DH has hard costs and they need to generate revenue to pay those costs from somewhere. I'm sure if they could afford to keep giving it away they would but they cannot. I also love the "in this economy" complaints. Do you think the DH is printing money "in this economy"? Times aren't just tough for you, the DH is feeling the pinch, too. Get over it. The only constant in life is change. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Just don't expect to get the same thing elsewhere for free. You have other options in the market for now but won't be long before this is the model everywhere.
By Dale (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 12:58 pm
With few, if any, people willing to pay this crazy amount, the advertisers won't have any audience left to advertise to. Goodbye, Daily Herald, it's been nice knowing you. You will be missed.
By Smartypants (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 1:05 pm
Good luck with that. All you need to do is go the free Associated Press site to read most of the articles found in the Herald anyways.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 1:21 pm
I agree with most of the comments here--epic failure. That we are in 2011 and huge news corps haven't figured out how to monetize their online content without charging people is absolutely ridiculous. Bloggers are doing this but the Daily Herald can't? Can't wait to read how this plays out, even if I already know the ending.
By former champion (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 1:25 pm
This is even more than Netflix with their ridiculous increase.. more than any pay channel.. come on now.. compare values here and you can only conclude this as the end for the Daily Herald.
By xwiseguyx (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 2:05 pm
While there is no doubt that the online portals for traditional newspapers have some financial value, if you're going to charge for access you have to make the cost of that access somewhat attractive in order to establish a viable business. $20/month is not attractive when you are competing with free. Charging your loyal current hard-copy subscribers is suicidal. You have to establish a sustainable customer base in order to be successful, and you also have to make sure you give your customers something worth paying for. Will the DH.com simply require login creds, or can users expect a dedicated mobile app for their money? Maybe starting off with a combined free/pay site like NYTimes where some content is free and other is premium would gradually attract a sustainable base. Simply going cold-turkey at $20/month is doomed to fail, mark my words.
By jcraig (verifiably) (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 2:38 pm
Now i can't follow the prep sports, oh well nice knowing you Herald....
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 2:47 pm
Doug Ray made a false statement in this article. "Of course, they have been getting free of charge much of what our subscribers have been paying for — the journalism — and they won’t any longer.” Newspaper subscribers have never, ever paid for content. They have paid for the paper, the ink and for delivery costs, if the paper was lucky. Advertisers have paid for the content, i.e. journalism. I understand that the business model is changing -- indeed, it must change. But let's not try to justify it by spreading BS that is contrary to what everybody in the industry already knows. Print readers do not pay for content -- period.
By Ted Schnell (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 3:11 pm
Verified, you're not verified.
By Holy Moly (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 3:25 pm
Those of you who believe that $20 a month for online content are absolutely correct -- and in agreement with Doug Ray. He's not trying to sell online subscriptions to generate more revenue; he's trying to sell more papers to generate revenue. So no, it's not the end of Herald. It won't make the paper subscribers go away, and if no online only subscribers come along, well they make just as much as they make on it now. jonesyjr has it right -- just like commercial-free cable and now the cell phone unlimited plans that are going away, free was just a hook. And the timing is right with declining quality/quantity of the ST and Trib products. Others will follow suit, and there jonesyjr also has it right in using the Netflix model. As more content providers begin charging, this cost-effective model will emerge. But think to the level -- just like cable and Netflix, that service will jack up rates to the point where you'll need to choose between what you're used to at a premium price, or what you're willing/able to afford.
By Nose Furr Ahtu (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 3:26 pm
'a note... from one longtime editor...: “May I say how excited I am about the company’s paid content plan... I’m absolutely thrilled that we’re setting the trend and perhaps inviting (daring?) the rest of the industry to follow us, instead of waiting for someone else to make a move.' This is the plan that the rest of the industry STARTED with, but readers didn't bite. Long on editing years, short on memory.
By Nose Furr Ahtu (again) (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 3:29 pm
Online toll isn't a pay wall but a meter like the NYT. I'm sure a bunch of views will be free and then if your are really consuming the content you have to pay. Just like in a new stand you read 3 or 4 stories then the guy ask, "hey buddy you going to pay for that?" It's less then most weekly coffee bill at star bucks, get over it.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 3:49 pm
The DH is delusional. Charging your loyal print subscribers for online access is pure greed. Especially after firing the last few actual reporters that were left after the previous bloodbath. Since columnist John Whiteside passed away the DH has gone downhill on a banana peel. It is a faux news source for this area controlled by city officials and politicians hellbent on keeping negative opinions and stories OUT of the news. A FAIR fee for monthly access is appropriate but gouging online readers and their already paying print subscribers is unacceptable. The only real reason anybody reads the paper is for the obituaries and they are fooling themselves if they think otherwise.
By Teresa (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 4:26 pm
$19.99 per month for a paper that seems to be geared to the protection of illegals? let the illegals pay. r.i.p. herald - an unreadable rag anyway.
By dman (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 5:20 pm
There is nothing that tickles me more than to have comments about me in the middle of a Daily Herald haystack. It's as if the party had crashed Jerry Berliant. I'd pay $20 a month for this. I'd pay $40 if the comments were in the middle of a tribute to Oliver O. Oliver.
By bruce wolf (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 5:36 pm
I received a letter from the Herald today referring to me as "Dear Valued Subscriber." I should be valued, as I've been a subscriber for more than three decades. The letter states: "Your inclusion in the Subscriber Total Access program will be optional," and adds "However, if you do not opt out of the program, your continued subscription to the Daily Herald will include the additional $1 per week." Nowhere in this letter does it describe the procedure to opt out! If it were not for my wife's desire to continue receiving the print edition, I would cancel immediately.
By Marty Robinson (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 7:41 pm
In the days before the Internet, it had always been a matter of record that the subscribers weren't really covering the cost of the newspaper--the advertisers were, based on the circulation figures. I would think that the way to go would be to continue to offer free content on the web, while charging advertising rates commensurate with the regular number of hits. Charging for web access will cause a dramatic drop in web hits, which in turn will make advertising space worth far less than before--ergo, they'll have to drop advertising rates. It seems to me that they'll be shooting themselves in the foot, because I don't see the gain in subscriber revenue making up for the loss in advertising revenue, especially in a recession--I think it will be a net (pardon the pun) loss, but if that's what they want, so be it.
By Larry (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 8:10 pm
He polled his staff?! I'll spend my $20/month on Spice Channel, but not DH.
By Starcastle (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 8:30 pm
What if Time Out Chicago starts charging for online access...? I guess I'll read the free Time Out Chicago at the library...
By TooMuch"News"Anyway (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 8:54 pm
HA, HA, HA.......FUNNIEST THING I'VE HEARD.....THEY ARE CRAZY!!!! THEY SHOULD PAY US TO READ THEIR PAPER.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 8/31/2011 at 11:35 pm
They're boldly pioneering the exact same business model that the "Dallas Morning News" implemented a few months ago. (To be fair, the opt-out is new. The DMN just jacked up every subscriber's rate to pay for the digital access.) Also, how can you let this chunk of newspeak slide? "We have developed two new advertising positions on our home page to accommodate additional advertising interest and to ensure we have inventory to meet customers’ needs." Translation: "We jammed two more ads on our homepage and made you pay extra to look at them. Cha-ching!"
By Ed D. (not verified) on 9/01/2011 at 6:27 am
As a regular surfer of news articles, on all sorts of topics. If i come across an article that tells me to subscribe so I can read the past the title, it's the most annoying thing ever. I just close the page. No big deal!
By Julia F (not verified) on 9/01/2011 at 7:09 am
I'm wondering how this will affect banner advertising on the Daily Herald site. Whether an advertiser pays for Cost per Impression or Cost per Click; the Daily Herald's revenue should dramatically decrease since there will be far fewer visits to their site. I think this is a huge risk that the Daily Herald is taking. Not only will they be losing readers, but advertiser money as well.
By Alex Mitich (not verified) on 9/02/2011 at 3:21 pm
This seems appropriate: I attempt to access www.dailyherald.com and my antivirus program announces, "Threat was blocked!" The threat name? "Exploit Link to Exploit Site." Better yet, no further information is available!
By Writer55 (not verified) on 9/03/2011 at 6:32 pm
I wonder how soon radio stations will stop broadcasting, or local TV stations will stop transmitting, to people who don't "subscribe" to their service.
By Suz (not verified) on 9/06/2011 at 4:18 pm
Greetings fans! I am NOT going to pay to comment on Daily Herald content! I will continue to subscribe the the DH print edition (for now) but not to their online edition. I hope Chuck finds a new outlet for his column as print subscribers begin to drop off and the DH eventually reduces itself to something more like the Naperville Sun at three days a week. I predict the "Patch" network will highly benefit from the DH move and hopefully will teach them a lesson. The DH should have allowed current subscribers free access not adding a buck a week to their rate.
By Analyze This (not verified) on 9/07/2011 at 10:55 am
I too got hit with a virus when I accessed dailyherald.com last week. Thankfully my AV program caught and after some diligence on my part I'm pretty sure it was eradicated. I have not been back to the site since and doubt I will. I never saw it mentioned anywhere. The DH should be ashamed they allowed that to happen. I bet many people got hit and if they didn't have AV software they better be checking bank accounts etc. as it was a nasty virus that steals all kinds of information.
By Bruce (not verified) on 9/07/2011 at 2:53 pm
Paddock Publishing can stuff it....First thing tomorrow morning I will be CANCELING my subscription to the PRINT edition of the Daily Herald. $20 per month for the online addition is not a reasonable price.....this is an asinine decision.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 9/08/2011 at 1:55 pm
IT might be worth $19.99 per year, not $19.95 per month. I'd much rather have HBO and Showtime both than read their paper online. If it were so popular online, they would have had ad revenues to support themselves.
By MikeJ (not verified) on 9/08/2011 at 6:41 pm
If you want to buy a house, you will have to receive the loan. Furthermore, my mother commonly uses a commercial loan, which is the most reliable.
By EveDillard32 (not verified) on 12/05/2011 at 10:19 pm
This post proved to be most useful to me. I have looked quite extensively for information such as this. Thanks for maintaining such a highly informative website.
By Thurston Jackson III (not verified) on 1/31/2012 at 9:56 am
Have an Opinion? Let's hear it
About Robert Feder
Robert Feder has been keeping tabs on the media for more than three decades, including 28 years as a reporter and television/radio columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times. He's a lifelong Chicagoan and graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. At age 14, he founded the first and only Walter Cronkite Fan Club.
Subscribe via e-mail

Browse the archives