Find an event

Honestly, Ebert reviews life on his terms

Posted in Robert Feder | Chicago Media blog by Robert Feder on Sep 23, 2011 at 12:00am

Roger Ebert

One of the countless little gems in Roger Ebert’s splendid new memoir, Life Itself, appears in the chapter on his alcoholism and his 32 years of sobriety. Recalling his life-saving association with Alcoholics Anonymous, he tells of an incident one night while he was moonlighting as a movie critic for a local TV station’s 10pm newscast:

“Funny things happened,” Ebert writes. “The anchor was an AA member. So was one of the reporters. After we got off work, we went to the 11pm meeting at the Mustard Seed. There were maybe a dozen others there. The anchor took the chair and asked if anyone was attending his or her first meeting. A guy said, ‘I am. But instead I should be in a psych ward. I was just watching the news, and right now I’m hallucinating that two of those people are in this room.’ ”

Like the man himself, there’s a lot to love about this warm, funny, insightful and thoroughly engaging book. At its heart, it’s an autobiography of a life well lived. But it’s much more than that: a love story about his devoted wife, Chaz; a remembrance of his late, great television partner, Gene Siskel; a flashback to his idyllic youth and carefree younger days as a Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaperman on the town; and reflections on the stars, filmmakers and cast of unforgettable characters who left their mark on him and, by extension, on his readers.

Despite the unimaginable challenges that he’s faced in the past five years since his health problems robbed him of his voice and his ability to eat and drink, Ebert knows he’s lived an amazingly rich, full life for an only child of working-class parents from Urbana.

Having cheated death only through the indomitable force of his wife’s love, Ebert writes movingly of his mortality:

“I know it is coming, and I do not fear it, because I believe there is nothing on the other side of death to fear. I hope to be spared as much pain as possible on the approach path. I was perfectly content before I was born, and I think of death as the same state. I am grateful for the gifts of intelligence, love, wonder and laughter. You can’t say it wasn’t interesting. My lifetime’s memories are what I have brought home from the trip. I will require them for eternity no more than that little souvenir of the Eiffel Tower I brought home from Paris.”

Given the brilliance and vitality of his work in print and especially online since he lost his power of speech, here’s hoping Roger continues to share his great gifts with us for many, many years to come. Life Itself leaves us wanting so much more from him.

Previous post
Next post
09/23/2011
Share with your network
Comment
Comments
Well said. Thank you, Rob....and THANK YOU, ROGER!
By JL (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 1:02 am
Roger, for years you have guided us towards motion pictures that would make us feel. Whether thumbs up or down, your opinions influenced us and were greatly respected. I can't wait to read your book. As your professional partner Gene Siskel already took his last bow, I couldn't help think that part of your courage and peace was drawn upon knowing you too have given a great life performance. I pray you and Chaz have abundantly more cherished days together. Thank you, Mickey Nelson
By Michaela Nelson (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 1:10 am
By sheer happenstance, I often found myself seated near Roger and Chaz at various movie screenings. It was never my intention to eavesdrop or intrude upon their privacy, but I witnessed firsthand what a loving couple they are. Their relationship was (and is) far more enlightening than most of the movies we sat through.
By Ted Okuda (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 2:15 am
We love you Roger. I, jack just hit 80, and hope to spend many more years reading your column.
By Jack&tricia kessie (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 8:53 am
Roger Ebert is one of the true crown jewels of Chicago journalism / literati.
By Mike G. (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 10:16 am
I have always enjoyed Ebert's film reviews and very, very often find myself in agreement with his critique. But his political views are so odious that I can't see myself ever reading his memoir. It seems that, films aside (and sometimes even in that), his hateful political views infest his whole life and guide too much of his views. Without doubt, though, he is a part of film history.
By Warner Todd Huston (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 11:05 am
I’m sure this is not a popular opinion, but I’m kind of sick and tired of Ebert. It is as if he has been around forever like Orion Samuelson and old Beatles songs that will never, ever go away.
By al (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 11:22 am
Who wants "Yesterday" to go away? True, there will be parts of "Ebert Victorious" that will be hard to stomach (he doesn't understand, for example, the nature of mutation in the theory of evolution which he so enthusiastically supports, and he sneered at Ronald Reagan for calling the Soviet Union the "Evil Empire," which it was), but the mustard seed story, which appeared in a Sun-Times double truck spread (which is now the amount of space for almost the entire news hole) was riveting. The guy can write.
By lise dominatrix (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 11:45 am
Correction: Mustard Seed
By lise dominatrix (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 11:52 am
Actually I like Orion Samuelson. He probably is one of only a few that I really enjoy listening to on WGN...his knowledge, wisdom and sense of humor.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 2:07 pm
Wow!!! Ebert, Orion and The Beatles. Sounds like a fantastic trio to me.
By johnrecordslandecker (not verified) on 9/23/2011 at 2:19 pm
Love the story Roger tells. I'm a member of the Club, too, and I wish I could remember all the funny and ironic happenings during my 22 years of meetings. God bless.
By Susanne (not verified) on 9/24/2011 at 6:02 pm
Janet Maslin starts off her NYT review, in the very first sentence, with a repetition of the canard that Ebert was awarded a star on the faux Hollywood Walk of Fame, which everyone knows is a paid PR gimmick. “Roger Ebert, the only film critic with a star on the Walk of Fame,” Maslin begins her review, neglecting to tell her readers at the sophisticated and truth-telling New York Times that Roger’s friends paid for the star in Los Angeles — to the tune of $25,000. It was not an award, and it was not an honor; his friends in Chicago nominated him and paid for the star to be there. Even Roger admits this. So why does Janet Maslin start off an otherwise lovely book review of a very great man with a fib? Ask her. I did, but she has chosen not to respond to me.
By Danny Bloom (not verified) on 9/24/2011 at 10:32 pm
He lost me as a follower when he became political. He should stick with his job reviewing movies.
By Kevin Abby (not verified) on 9/25/2011 at 2:07 am
Kevin--Do you react as strongly when Tim Dolan And Fran George become derailed from their raison d'etre and begin meddling in the legal and political aspects of certain issues such as the civil rights of gay citizens to marry, or citizens seeking legal medical services that the "Posse of Bishops" does not approve. Do you inform the Arch Diocese that you demand that Mutha Church start paying taxes if they are going to politic from the pulpit, as the law requires? How about the Koch brothers taking time away from the oil business to invest hundreds of millions to influence policy and elections, that bother you as much as a film critic having political thoughts? I like John Wayne and William Holden movies yet cannot stand their politics, but during the movie, it never comes up. Sean Penn, political windbag talented actor. My best friend is REAL redstate, it's irrelevant to our friendship. I don't have to always be agreed with.
By Goophee (not verified) on 9/25/2011 at 5:21 am
Regardless of the reader's feelings, your affection and admiration, Robert, are clear and really well written. Nicely done.
By Jeff R (not verified) on 9/25/2011 at 12:26 pm
"Who wants "Yesterday" to go away?" That is very funny! Where does the time go? I can tell you: the past.
By al (not verified) on 9/25/2011 at 2:07 pm
I miss Gene Siskel. He was my favorite critic.
By JennaRox (not verified) on 9/25/2011 at 4:30 pm
What's wrong with Ebert, Orion Samuelson and the Beatles? Does "al" prefer Roeper, Dean Richards and the Smashing Pumpkins? Puh-leeze!
By Robert Andrukiewicz (not verified) on 9/26/2011 at 2:46 am
Thanks so much, my old pal Rob. As I have explained to Danny Bloom over and over again, while one must for pay the expense of a star on the Walk of Fame, one cannot "buy" it. It is voted on. Otherwise, there would be tens of thousands. He could have one.
By Roger Ebert (not verified) on 9/26/2011 at 10:01 am
From A.A.'s 12 traditions: Eleven—Our public relations policy is based on attraction rather than promotion; we need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio and films. Twelve—Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all our Traditions, ever reminding us to place principles before personalities. It seems Mr. Ebert is a better writer than he is a reader.
By Anonymous (not verified) on 9/26/2011 at 4:44 pm
Roger, re ...."As I have explained to Danny Bloom over and over again, while one must for pay the expense of a star on the Walk of Fame, one cannot "buy" it. It is voted on. Otherwise, there would be tens of thousands. He could have one." This is true, and I stand corrected, Roger. Thanks, and I agree with you on this. You should know that now the AP is reporting all Walk of Fame stories on the AP wire with the last graf stating that "all stars are purchased at a price of $30k by the studios as a marketing gimmick." Ap just did one on Shakira and it's in the last graf. Go look and google. Now i am aiming at the Oscar campaigns by studios are how evil they are, as you suggested me to right. here i go. -- danny
By danny bloom (not verified) on 11/13/2011 at 3:19 am
Here is the AP story by Ap reporter Edwin Tamara in LA: An AP editor heard me out and wrote back in July, noting: “You’ve made an interesting point about how the media reports the Walk of Fame ceremonies. If your facts are correct, you’re exactly right that we should add that context [that the star ceremony is a paid publicity event]. I’ll pass along to our entertainment editor.” And today, Roger and Mr Feder, as I was reading my daily print newspaper about Shakira recently getting her star on the Walk of Fame, the very last paragraph of a very thorough news story by AP reporter Edwin Tamara said: “A committee selects celebrities eligible for a Walk of Fame star and those who accept pay US$30,000 in costs and fees.”
By Danny (not verified) on 11/13/2011 at 3:22 am
Have an Opinion? Let's hear it
About Robert Feder
Robert Feder has been keeping tabs on the media for more than three decades, including 28 years as a reporter and television/radio columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times. He's a lifelong Chicagoan and graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. At age 14, he founded the first and only Walter Cronkite Fan Club.
Subscribe via e-mail

Browse the archives